Apologeet.nl
What does the Bible mean by ‘believing’?LORDSHIP VS FREE GRACE EXAMINED
Introduction
“Faith saves you… but what exactly is faith?”
Because this is where things go wrong: one group says you just need to believe, the other says that true faith always becomes evident in your life.
And both sides sometimes even call each other ‘dangerous’ or ‘heretics’.
In theology, these two approaches are often described as Free Grace and Lordship Salvation — but really, it all comes down to one fundamental question: what is biblical faith?
But… how can that be when we all read Ephesians 2:8–9?
Today I want to explore one question honestly:
what does the Bible actually mean by ‘believing’?
Because if you look at it closely, this isn’t about two opinions… but about two completely different definitions of the same word: faith.
And that means: someone might think they’re defending the gospel… when in reality they are defending a different definition of ‘faith’.
My attitude towards the Bible
Before I go into that, I’d like to say something important about how I myself read the Bible.
I do not try to pretend that my interpretation is equivalent to the text itself.
Scripture has authority — my interpretation does not.
That is why I deliberately use phrases such as ‘it seems’ or ‘when I read these texts together’.
Not because the Bible is uncertain, but because my interpretation may well be.
The Bible says what it says. My task is to read those texts as carefully as possible.
Roadmap
Today we’re going to look at three things:
- What does the Bible mean by ‘believing’?
- Why do Christians come to such different conclusions about this?
- What does the Bible really mean by ‘believing’ — and why is it so often misunderstood?
And at the end, I’ll be honest about where I stand on this myself — without taking sides.
Where does this debate actually come from?
Before we look at the substance of the matter, it’s worth realising that this tension is nothing new.
What we today call ‘Lordship vs Free Grace’ is actually a modern way of describing a much older question:
Ever since the beginning of Christianity, you can see that Christians have emphasised these two opposing views:
- on the one hand, that salvation is entirely by grace, received through faith,
- and, on the other hand, that true faith is never separate from a transformed life.
And it is precisely this tension that we still see today.
What both sides have in common
Before we discuss the differences, it is important to keep the fundamentals clear.
Both sides affirm:
- salvation is by grace
- not by works
- Christ alone is the basis of salvation
That is not a mere detail. That is the heart of the gospel.
The key question: what does the Bible mean by ‘believing’?
The real question is not simply: faith versus works
But: what does the Bible mean when it speaks of ‘believing’?
For in Scripture you always see two strands:
- salvation is a gift (not earned)
- but faith is never described as something neutral or separate
James 2:17
So also faith, if it has no works, is dead in itself.
And this is where it gets interesting… because when you compare these two themes side by side, it almost seems as though the Bible contains a tension within itself.
What does the Bible mean by ‘faith’?
If you compare all the texts side by side, a certain pattern seems to emerge.
Summary
In Scripture, faith seems to encompass something like this:
- trusting in Christ as Saviour
- “Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 16:31)
- relying on Him
- “Come to Me…” (Matt. 11:28)
- not merely acknowledging something, but resting in Him
- “Whoever believes in Me has eternal life” (John 6:47)
- a faith that is inseparable from repentance and inner transformation
- “repentance towards God and faith in Christ” (Acts 20:21)
At the end of his Gospel, John even explains why he is writing:
John 20:31
These, however, have been written down so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in His Name.
This is important, because John directly links faith to eternal life in Christ. The discussion is therefore not primarily about whether faith saves, but what Scripture means by that faith.
But at the same time:
- faith is never presented as a human achievement or merit
- “For by grace you have been saved… not by works” (Eph. 2:8–9)
An important nuance
The Bible therefore seems to hold to two things at once:
- faith is not merely agreeing with facts
- “Even the demons believe – and tremble” (James 2:19)
- but faith is not, either, an extra work alongside grace
In Scripture, faith appears to be more than mere assent to facts, yet at the same time it is not treated as a human achievement.
That is why many theologians say that faith is not a merit, but a connection with Christ as a gift from God.
Two legitimate concerns (with pitfalls)
If you listen carefully, both sides are safeguarding something that is biblically important.
Free Grace emphasises:
Add nothing to faith.
Their biblical concern: Ephesians 2:8–9 — grace alone, not by works.
Their pitfall: Faith is sometimes reduced to merely: “I agree that it is true”, without clarifying what biblical faith actually means in substance as trust in Christ.
And that sounds very safe… until you ask the question: how, then, does the Bible itself describe faith in its fullness? In their own interpretation, the emphasis is precisely that change is not a condition or criterion for salvation, but a possible consequence of salvation.
Salvation is seen as something that rests entirely on faith alone, whilst fruit and change belong to the life that follows that faith, as part of growth and sanctification, not as a yardstick for certainty.
Lordship emphasises:
Do not empty faith of its meaning.
Their biblical concern: James 2:17 — faith without works is dead.
Their pitfall: there is a risk that people will seek their assurance in the extent of their change.
People start to ask themselves: “How will I ever know that I truly believe?”
And in a way, you can see that both sides are trying to protect something valuable:
- one side does not want grace to be tainted by works
- the other does not want faith to be reduced to mere words
What does the Bible itself say?
When I compare the texts side by side, I see the same pattern recurring:
- salvation is entirely by grace
- faith is the only means
- but in the Bible, that faith is never separated from repentance, trust and a new direction.
Acts 20:21
I proclaimed to both Jews and Greeks repentance towards God and faith in our Lord Jesus Christ.
And when you compare this with what we saw earlier, a consistent yet tension-filled picture emerges:
- grace is entirely free
- faith is the means
- but faith is rarely described in Scripture as something neutral or isolated
Where the discussion often goes wrong
What I often see is this:
- people first define ‘believing’ within their own framework
- and then read the entire Bible through that lens
- and that’s when labels emerge:
- ‘Lordship’
- ‘Free Grace’
- ‘heresy’
- ‘false doctrine’
And at that point, the conversation shifts:
from textual analysis to defending one’s position. And that is precisely the moment when the conversation often stops listening… and starts defending.
But what if the problem isn’t in the texts… but in how we define ‘faith’?
Why do Christians come to different conclusions here?
Perhaps you’re wondering: if the Bible is God’s Word, how is it that sincere believers come to such different conclusions?
This often has nothing to do with a different Bible, but with a different starting point.
One reads mainly Paul.
Others focus mainly on James.
One emphasises grace.
Others on fruit.
But ultimately, everyone reads Scripture with certain emphases and starting points.
And that is why it is important to ask yourself:
“What exactly am I basing my interpretation on?”
And that is precisely where I try to exercise caution myself.
Not because truth is relative, but because my interpretation never takes precedence over the text.
On how we treat one another
There’s something else I find important.
As I’ve already said, words like the following tend to crop up quickly in discussions of this sort:
- heretic
- false teacher
- deception
And in a way, I do understand the intention a little.
People want to protect the truth. But the question is whether we always realise what we’re doing when we’re so quick to label someone’s spiritual state.
Not because the truth isn’t important. But because the Bible teaches us that we cannot see into another person’s heart.
That is why I try to be cautious myself. Not because everything is the same, but because humility is also a biblical attitude.
And sometimes people say:
“Yes, the truth is simply harsh.”
But Paul writes, on the contrary:
“holding fast to the truth in love” (Ephesians 4:15)
And 1 Corinthians 13 shows that even the correct truth loses its power without love:
1 Corinthians 13:1
If I speak in the tongues of men and of angels, but have not love, I have become a resounding gong or a clanging cymbal.
The Bible never pits truth against love, nor does it ever separate them.
What I am trying to hold on to
I am trying to hold on to two things at once:
- I do not wish to supplement God’s grace with human conditions
- but neither do I want to pretend that faith is merely an intellectual assent
And that tension is not merely theoretical for me — I see it reflected in the way the Bible itself speaks.
When I read these passages together, I come to the conclusion that faith was never intended to be something purely intellectual, nor is it an achievement we must perform in order to be saved, or to continue living by our own strength rather than in dependence on Christ.
Rather, it resembles a trust so genuine that it cannot fail to move a person, without that change becoming the basis of salvation or the foundation upon which we build our assurance.
Galatians 5:6
For in Christ Jesus neither circumcision nor uncircumcision counts for anything, but only faith working through love.
Here too you see the same tension:
- not works as the basis
- but faith that does not remain empty
- faith that is made visible in love
What I mean to say
I do not wish to say more than the Bible says.
But neither do I want to say less.
And perhaps the better question isn’t: which side are you on?
But:
am I doing justice to everything that Scripture seems to reveal about faith, grace and repentance all at once?
For me, that means I understand both Free Grace in its emphasis on grace, and Lordship in its emphasis that faith is never empty or non-committal. But I do not want either of those two emphases to replace the whole.
Perhaps after watching this video, some will still think I lean too much towards Free Grace, whilst others will think I lean too much towards Lordship. That’s fine. My aim is not to defend a particular camp, but to do as much justice as possible to everything that Scripture seems to reveal about faith, grace and conversion. And that is precisely why I want to conclude by stating where I stand myself.
So where do I stand?
I believe that salvation is entirely by grace, through faith alone, and that it is God’s Spirit who brings this about in us.
At the same time, I believe that the faith described in Scripture never seems to be intended as something separate from repentance, genuine trust in Christ and a life that is thereby transformed.
In summary:
- Salvation comes through faith alone.
- According to the Bible, conversion, trust and a transformed life are the logical consequence of that faith. Not as a condition for salvation, but as the work of the Holy Spirit in the life of a believer. At the same time, a person may resist this to a greater or lesser extent in the practical reality of sanctification. And here I do not mean degrees of salvation itself, but the extent of spiritual growth following conversion.
1 Corinthians 3:15
If anyone’s work is burnt up, he will suffer loss; yet he himself will be saved, but only as through fire.
That image from 1 Corinthians 3 reveals something important: the foundation is Christ alone. Not the quality of our lives, not the perfection of our faith, but His work. Personally, I also find great comfort in this. A believer may fail seriously, bear little fruit and even suffer loss. But the foundation of his salvation remains Christ. That is why my assurance ultimately rests not on my achievements, but on Him.
A final test
Perhaps this will help as a final step in this discussion.
In Acts 17, we read about the Bereans:
Acts 17:11
And these were more noble-minded than those in Thessalonica, for they received the word with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures daily to see whether these things were so.
That is ultimately the attitude I wish to maintain myself:
Not: ‘Which side is right?’
but: “What does Scripture itself seem to show when you examine it in its entirety?”
Final conclusion
And perhaps that is precisely what this whole discussion is ultimately about:
that salvation lies entirely outside ourselves… but that faith centred on Christ, according to Scripture, normally bears fruit.
I do not wish to say more than the Bible says. Nor do I wish to say less.
And ultimately, the question is not:
“Lordship or Free Grace?”
but:
is Christ truly the foundation upon which I rest?
